Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Patellofemoral joint stress measured across three different running techniques

Texto completo
Autor(es):
dos Santos, Ana Flavia [1, 2] ; Nakagawa, Theresa Helissa [3] ; Serrao, Fabio Viadanna [1] ; Ferber, Reed [2]
Número total de Autores: 4
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Phys Therapy Dept, Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Kinesiol, Calgary, AB - Canada
[3] North Univ Ctr, Phys Therapy Dept, Manaus, Amazonas - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 3
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: GAIT & POSTURE; v. 68, p. 37-43, FEB 2019.
Citações Web of Science: 3
Resumo

Background: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common running-related injury. It has been shown in previous studies that gait retraining may have a beneficial effect on patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS). Research question: Is there a reduction of PFJS across 4 running conditions: 1. runner's typical rearfoot strike pattern, 2. forefoot landing, 3. step rate increase by 10% and 4. forward trunk lean? Methods: Nineteen healthy runners (28.05 +/- 5.03 years; 26.58 +/- 8.85 km/week, 6.00 +/- 4.51 years of running experience) completed one running trial for each condition, at the same subject-specific comfortable speed on a treadmill. Kinetic and kinematic data were collected and measures of hip, knee and ankle joint moments and PFJS were calculated. Results: Compared to rearfoot strike condition, peak PFJS and PFJS-time integral per step were significantly (P < 0.01) lower during forefoot landing and step rate increase conditions. PFJS per kilometer was significantly reduced for forefoot landing (17.01%; P < 0.01) and increased step rate (12.90%; P = 0.003). Forward trunk lean technique showed no significant differences in peak PFJS (P = 0.187), PFJS-time integral per step (P = 0.815) and PFJS per kilometer (P = 0.077) compared to rearfoot strike pattern. Interpretation: The comparison between techniques revealed greater reductions on PFJS by forefoot landing, followed by 10% step rate increase condition. These changes were the result of different lower limb movement strategies across the 2 running conditions. We conclude that compared to a rearfoot strike pattern, both a forefoot landing and step rate increase result in lower cumulative PFJS joint stress in healthy runners, with the forefoot landing being the most effective. These running technique modifications could be recommended to reduce PFJS loads and may have implications for PFP prevention. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 13/26318-7 - Efeitos da modificação da técnica de corrida na cinemática e ativação muscular dos membros inferiores em corredores com e sem dor patelofemoral
Beneficiário:Ana Flávia dos Santos
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado
Processo FAPESP: 15/20306-2 - Estresse patelofemoral e taxas de impacto vertical durante a corrida com aterrissagem com antepé, corrida com aumento na frequência de passos e corrida com aumento da flexão do tronco
Beneficiário:Ana Flávia dos Santos
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Exterior - Estágio de Pesquisa - Doutorado