Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

an we explain running-related injury preventive behavior? A path analysi

Full text
Author(s):
Hespanhol, Luiz [1, 2, 3] ; Vallio, Caio Sain [2] ; van Mechelen, Willem [1, 4, 5, 3, 6, 7] ; Verhagen, Evert [1, 3, 6]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Locat VU Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam VUmc, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst APH, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth DPOH, Amsterdam - Netherlands
[2] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo UNICID, Masters & Doctoral Programs Phys Therapy, Rua Cesario Galeno 448, BR-03071100 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[3] Locat VU Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam VUmc, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam Collaborat Hlth & Safety Sports ACHSS, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Amsterdam - Netherlands
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Publ Hlth Physiotherapy & Populat Sci, Dublin - Ireland
[5] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Human Movement Sci, Groningen - Netherlands
[6] Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Human Biol, Div Exercise Sci & Sports Med ESSM, Cape Town - South Africa
[7] Univ Queensland, Fac Hlth & Behav Sci, Sch Human Movement & Nutr Sci, Brisbane, Qld - Australia
Total Affiliations: 7
Document type: Journal article
Source: BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY; v. 25, n. 5, p. 601-609, SEP-OCT 2021.
Web of Science Citations: 1
Abstract

Background: Behavioral and social science theories/models have been gaining attention in sports injury prevention. Objective: To investigate the potential of the Theory of Planned Behavior in explaining running-related injury preventive behavior. Methods: Six-month prospective cohort study based on data gathered from a randomized controlled trial. From a total of 1512 invited trail runners, 232 were included in this study. Preventive behaviors and their determinants were assessed at baseline and two and six months after baseline. Five-point Likert scales were used to assess the determinants of preventive behavior. A Bayesian path analysis was conducted applying mixed models and mediation analysis. Results: A 1-point increase in intention, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control predicted an increase of 54% (95% Bayesian credible interval {[}BCI]: 38, 71) in the rate of performing running-related injury preventive behavior, explaining 49% (R-2 0.49; 95% BCI: 0.41, 0.56) of the variance around preventive behavior. Intention and perceived behavioral control predicted running-related injury preventive behavior directly, while 40% (95% BCI: 21, 61) and 44% (95% BCI: 20, 69) of the total effect of attitude was mediated by intention and perceived behavioral control, respectively. Attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control predicted intention. Conclusions: The Theory of Planned Behavior may have the potential to explain half of the variance around running-related injury preventive behavior and intention. Therefore, such theory may be considered a relevant and useful tool in developing, investigating, and/or implementing programs aimed at preventing running-related injuries. (C) 2021 Associacao Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 17/11665-4 - Development and evaluation process of a prevention program on running-related injuries
Grantee:Caio Sain Vallio
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate (Direct)
FAPESP's process: 16/09220-1 - Development and evaluation process of a prevention program on running-related injuries
Grantee:Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior
Support Opportunities: Research Grants - Young Investigators Grants