Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

omparative effect of dense-and-disperse versus non-repetitive and non-sequential frequencies in electroacupuncture-induced analgesia in a rodent model of peripheral neuropathic pai

Full text
Author(s):
Show less -
Chao, Liaw [1, 2] ; Goncalves, Alexandre S. R. [1] ; Campos, Ana Carolina P. [1] ; Assis, V, Daniele ; Jeronimo, Rodrigo [3] ; Kuroki, Mayra A. [3] ; Sant'Anna, Fernando M. [4] ; Meas, Yunsan [5, 6] ; Rouxeville, Yves [7] ; Hsing, Wu [2] ; Pagano, Rosana L. [3]
Total Authors: 11
Affiliation:
[1] Hosp Sirio Libanes, Lab Neurosci, Rua Prof Daher Cutait 69, BR-01308060 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Acupuncture Ctr, Med Sch, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Assis, Daniele, V, Hosp Sirio Libanes, Lab Neurosci, Rua Prof Daher Cutait 69, BR-01308060 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Macae - Brazil
[5] Ctr Evaluat & Traitement Douleur CETD, Nantes - France
[6] Ctr Hosp Univ Nantes, Nantes - France
[7] Int Coll Auriculomed & Auriculotherapy Review, Cd Lazaro Cardenas, Michoacan - Mexico
Total Affiliations: 7
Document type: Journal article
Source: Acupuncture in Medicine; v. 40, n. 2 NOV 2021.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a complex disease that remains challenging to treat. Low-frequency dense-and-disperse (DD) electroacupuncture (EA) has been used as adjuvant therapy for neuropathic pain; however, its analgesic effect decreases as stimulation time increases, or when it is repeatedly used. We hypothesized that a new frequency parameter could improve the effectiveness of EA, and aimed to compare the efficacy and duration of the analgesic effect between classic DD-EA and non-repetitive and non-sequential frequency (random frequency (RF)-EA) in neuropathic rats. Furthermore, the effect of RF-EA at local traditional acupuncture point locations versus auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) was evaluated. Methods: Male Wistar rats with peripheral neuropathy were subjected to a single session of DD-EA or RF-EA for 20 or 40 min at ST36 + GB34. An additional group of rats was treated with RF-EA for 20 min using aVNS at the appropriate ear point locations. Paw pressure test, von Frey filaments and spontaneous pain scores were evaluated. Sham-operated rats were used as controls. Results: In all, 20 min of RF-EA reversed hyperalgesia (for 24 h) and allodynia (for 8 h), showing a longer analgesic effect than DD-EA. Both RF-EA and DD-EA induced partial inhibition of spontaneous pain for 8 h. Forty minutes of DD-EA did not interfere with the NP phenomena; however, RF-EA induced significant long-term analgesia. aVNS induced an analgesic effect similar to local stimulation. Conclusion: This pilot study shows that RF-EA at both local traditional acupuncture point and auriculotherapy point locations induces long-lasting analgesia in neuropathic rats, and more effectively so than classical DD-EA. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 18/18695-9 - Deep brain stimulation and Parkinsons Disease: neuroinflammation control as therapeutic target
Grantee:Ana Carolina Pinheiro Campos
Support type: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate (Direct)