Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Effects of electromyographic biofeedback interventions for shoulder pain and function: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Full text
Author(s):
Kamonseki, Danilo Harudy [1] ; Calixtre, Leticia Bojikian [2] ; Barreto, Rodrigo Py Goncalves [1] ; Camargo, Paula Rezende [1]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos UFSCar, Lab Anal & Intervent, Shoulder Complex, Sao Carlos - Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Review article
Source: CLINICAL REHABILITATION; v. 35, n. 7 FEB 2021.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback interventions to improve pain and function of patients with shoulder pain. Design: Systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Literature search: Databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) were searched in December 2020. Study selection criteria: Randomized clinical trials that investigated the effects of electromyographic biofeedback for individuals with shoulder pain. Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes were collected and synthesized. Data synthesis: The level of evidence was synthesized using GRADE and Standardized Mean Differences and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects inverse variance model for meta-analysis. Results: Five studies were included with a total sample of 272 individuals with shoulder pain. Very-low quality of evidence indicated that electromyographic biofeedback was not superior to control for reducing shoulder pain (standardized mean differences = -0.21, 95% confidence interval: -0.67 to 0.24, P = 0.36). Very-low quality of evidence indicated that electromyographic biofeedback interventions were not superior to control for improving shoulder function (standardized mean differences = -0.11, 95% confidence interval: -0.41 to 0.19, P = 0.48). Conclusion: Electromyographic biofeedback may be not effective for improving shoulder pain and function. However, the limited number of included studies and very low quality of evidence does not support a definitive recommendation about the effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback to treat individuals with shoulder pain. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 19/07689-0 - Improving Shoulder Health for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury through an Ergonomic Wheelchair
Grantee:Danilo Harudy Kamonseki
Support Opportunities: Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Doctorate